Understanding this new socioeconomic environment is critical for investors. But assessing the depth of an organization’s “consciousness” demands a different type of analysis – one that uncovers what companies value and how they think and behave. The mosaic of information necessary to certify conscious companies is complex and the current disclosure regime for public companies leaves much to be desired. Organizations like the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board are pursuing a long-term transition towards more transparent reporting practices that speak to “extra-financial” performance. The degree to which such efforts will be successful is unclear. In the meantime, investors must leverage proxies to assess the degree to which companies are truly managing for stakeholders. While such third-party indicators are imperfect, they do provide signals to guide smarter investment decisions. Here are four focus areas to begin your conscious company search.
1 EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT & CULTURE
According to a Gallup study, companies with high employee engagement enjoy 72 percent greater earnings per share than those with low engagement. Unfortunately, most organizations do not disclose engagement metrics. Fortune’s “100 Best Companies to Work For” is one place to build your understanding of where the most engaged employees work. The Great Place to Work Institute, which surveys about 250 firms yearly, helps Fortune pick the winners. Its methodology takes into account management credibility, job satisfaction, camaraderie, pay and benefit programs, hiring practices, methods of internal communication, training, recognition programs, and diversity efforts. Glassdoor, the online job board that collects data on how employees feel about management, is another valuable resource to use to gather insights into engagement and culture. Although the information accessible via Fortune and Glassdoor is incomplete and subjective, it does begin to clarify how companies relate to their team members.
“SINCE CUSTOMERS OF CONSCIOUS COMPANIES ARE SUCH PASSIONATE SUPPORTERS, THEY ARE MORE LIKELY TO BE VOCAL WORD-OF-MOUTH ADVOCATES.”
2 CUSTOMER LOYALTY
Loyal customers are among the most powerful determinants of the ability to generate sustainable cash flow. There are a number of solutions available to investors willing to pay to better understand how various organizations drive customer loyalty. Satmetrix provides benchmarks of Net Promoter Scores (NPS) by industry. wRatings takes NPS a step further by analyzing how more than 3,300 companies across 12 industries meet customers’ emotional and technical needs.
If you are not willing or able to invest in these services, another option is to explore the percentage of capital that companies spend on marketing to their customers – information that is accessible via many analyst reports. Anecdotally, stakeholder-focused companies invest less capital in persuading customers of the virtues of their products and services. For example, grocery chain Trader Joe’s spends less than 1 percent of revenue on marketing. Since customers of conscious companies are such passionate supporters, they are more likely to be vocal word-of-mouth advocates. So, another way to assess the nature of customer relationships is through examining the volume and tone of social media posts related to the brand. The social analytics company Verifeed provides one way to do so. Combining these methods could be a path to understanding how customers feel about the companies in your portfolio.
3 ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, AND GOVERNANCE RATINGS
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) ratings offer another area of potential analysis. Many “social” or “impact” funds and a number of mainstream fund managers are exploring ways to integrate the multitude of data from ESG ratings agencies such as Sustainalytics and MSCI. This data is necessary when considering how companies manage risk. Good ESG practices generally mean a lower probability of big environmental blowups and financial shenanigans, but they do not necessarily signal consciousness or a belief in the stakeholder model. The environmental pedigree of many of these agencies, the difficulty of attaining metrics for social performance, and a tenuous connection between some of the governance measures and the outcomes they purport to achieve make these ratings insufficient consciousness indicators. We suggest that investors consider this data while acknowledging its limitations. A more robust analysis might also include information on reputational risk and management of intangible assets. The work of Steel City Re and the Reputation Institute provides a place to begin this process.
4 SUPPLY CHAIN PRACTICES
A thorough review of supply chain practices is a very powerful way to build an understanding of how companies manage for stakeholders. As organizations move up the supply chain maturity ladder and develop mutually beneficial relationships with suppliers, they eliminate headline risks. And when companies treat suppliers well, we can surmise that they also build strong bonds with other stakeholders (like employees), who are often seen as more “core” to their missions. North Carolina State University professor Robert Handfield does excellent research on the impact of supply chain maturity. His work demonstrates how long-standing and evolved relationships with suppliers not only indicate stability, but can also signal companies that are fair, honest, and transparent in their business relationships – all key components of conscious business practices. The best-performing, most sustainable businesses of the future will be those that adopt the tenets of conscious capitalism. Yet spotting conscious companies is not as easy as we would like. The mix of quantitative and qualitative measures necessary to determine an organization’s consciousness makes for a messy research effort, and most analysts simply do not have the time or patience to do the work. Today, many investors direct their capital towards organizations that embrace some aspect of positive social and environmental impact. Various sustainability- and corporate-responsibility-oriented funds already exist, and that is a good thing. We should continue to support companies that are responsible community members and good stewards of the environment. But there is an opportunity to go deeper – to think more holistically about how to enable and benefit from deeply conscious businesses through investment decisions.
“COLLECTIVELY, WE ARE EVOLVING THE WAY WE MAKE DECISIONS ABOUT THE BUSINESSES WE WANT TO BUY FROM, WORK FOR, PARTNER WITH, ALLOW INTO OUR COMMUNITIES, AND INVEST IN.”
Daniel Dworkin is a Partner with Schaffer Consulting, where he helps organizations unlock capacity for dramatic, lasting results. Daniel also serves as a project leader for the Rapid Results Institute, which tackles complex global development challenges. He is on the leadership team of the New York City Conscious Capitalism Chapter.
Jeff Cherry is the Founder and Executive Director of the Conscious Venture Lab, an accelerator and venture capital fund for conscious entrepreneurship. He is an evangelist for the transformation of capitalism, attempting to bring whole-brain thinking into the realm of business creation and a more human-centered form of investing. www.consciousventurelab.com